Functional and Radiological Outcome of Fracture Subtrochanteric Femur Treated by Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA)

Authors

  • Jagdesh Kumar Department of Orthopaedics, D.U.H.S & Civil hospital Karachi
  • Muhammad Soughat Katto Department of Orthopaedics, D.U.H.S & Civil hospital Karachi
  • Mehtab Ahmed Pirwani Department of Orthopaedics, D.U.H.S & Civil hospital Karachi
  • Nusrat Rasheed Department of Orthopaedics, D.U.H.S & Civil hospital Karachi
  • Irfan Muhammad Rajput Department of Orthopaedics, D.U.H.S & Civil hospital Karachi
  • Syed Salman Adil Department of Orthopaedics, D.U.H.S & Civil hospital Karachi

Keywords:

Subtrochanteric femur fracture, intramedullary, Proximal femoral nail.

Abstract

femur treated by PFNA.

Methods: A prospective analytic cross-sectional study was conducted at Orthopaedic Surgery department, Dow Medical College & Dr. Ruth Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi during the period from January 2017 to May 2018. Thirty-three patients with Subtrochanteric femur fracture according to Russell and Taylor Classification Type IA & B were operated with Proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). Patients were assessed clinically for functional outcome based on Harris hip score and radiologically for union. Typical post-surgical morbidity (i.e., Infection, delayed union, nonunion, mal-union and fixation failure) were noted.

Multiple fractures in polytrauma patients, pathological fractures, open fractures, poor ambulatory patients previous to the fracture and related neurovascular injuries were excluded from the study.

Results: A total of 33 patients (21 males, 12 females; mean age 49.5 years) were treated with PFNA. Based on Russell and Taylor classification: 18 had Type IA and 15 had Type IB fractures. The mean follow-up duration was 11 months (range, 9 to 16 months). All fractures were united in an average time of 18.4 weeks). Superficial stitch infection was seen in 5 cases. We had no instance of deep infection. Distal locking screw was broken in two patients. Implant failure and / or Nonunion were not observed whereas delayed union was noted in 5 patients. The functional outcome results were (as per Harris hip scoring system) excellent and good in 27(81.8%) and fair to poor in 6 (18%) cases.

Conclusions: The post-operative clinical and radiological outcome suggest that PFNA is an exceptional device for treatment of fracture subtrochantric femur. Although technically demanding, it avoids extensive soft tissue dissection and iatrogenic bony devascularization thus decrease the incidence fracture nonunion and implant failure and at the same time provide much more axial stability due to its intramedullary placement thus it allows the patients to move relatively early following surgery.

References

1. Umer M, Rashid H, Shah I, Qadir I. Use of femoral nail with spiral blade in subtrochanteric fractures. Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcic. 2014;48(1):32-6.
2. Saarenpää I, Heikkinen T, Jalovaara P. Treatment of subtrochanteric fractures. A comparison of the Gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw: short-term outcome in 58 patients. International orthopaedics. 2007 Feb;31(1):65-70.
3. Patel R, Menon H, Chaudhari N, Chaudhari V. Subtrochanteric femur fractures treated with extramedullary or intramedullary fixation at tertiary care centre. International Journal. 2017;6(2):226.
4. Hak DJ, Wu H, Dou C, Mauffrey C, Stahel PF. Challenges in Subtrochanteric Femur Fracture Management. Orthopedics. 2015 Aug;38(8):498-502.
5. Wang WY, Yang TF, Fang Y, Lei MM, Wang GL, Liu L. Treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fracture with long proximal femoral nail antirotation. Chin J traumatol. 2010 Feb;13(1):37-41.
6. Koch JC. The laws of bone architecture. Developmental Dynamics. 1917 Mar;21(2):177-298.
7. Rybicki E, Simonen F, Weis E. On the mathematical analysis of stress in the human femur. Journal of biomechanics. 1972 Mar;5(2):203-15.
8. ?ahin EK, ?merci A, K?n?k H, Karap?nar L, Canbek U, Savran A. Comparison of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) with AO dynamic condylar screws (DCS) for the treatment for unstable peritrochanteric femoral fractures. Eur J Orthop surg Traumatol. 2014 Apr;24:347–352.
9. Radaideh AM, Qudah HA, Audat ZA, Jahmani RA, Yousef IR, Saleh AAA. Functional and Radiological Results of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) Osteosynthesis in the Treatment of Unstable Pertrochanteric Fractures. J Clin Med. 2018 Apr;7(4).
10. Abraham VT, Chandrasekaran M, Mahapatra S. Outcome of subtrochanteric fracture of the femur managed with proximal femoral nail. Int Surg J. 2016;3(3):1296-300.
11. Mereddy P, Kamath S, Ramakrishnan M, Malik H, Donnachie N. The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA): a new design for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury. 2009 Apr;40(4):428-32.
12. Imerci A, Canbek U, Karatosun V, Karapinar L, Yesil M. Nailing or plating for subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a non-randomized comparative study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jul;25(5):889-94.
13. Shen L, Zhang Y, Shen Y, Cui Z. Antirotation proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Jun;99(4):377-83.
14. Hodel S, Beeres FJ, Babst R, Link B-C. Complications following proximal femoral locking compression plating in unstable proximal femur fractures: medium-term follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 Dec;27(8):1117-24.
15. Sadic S, Custovic S, Jasarevic M, Fazlic M, Smajic N, Hrustic A, et al. Proximal femoral nail antirotation in treatment of fractures of proximal femur. Med Arh. 2014;68(3):173-7.
16. Weinlein JC. Fractures And Dislocations Of Hip; Subtrochantric femoral fractures. In: Azar FM, Canale ST, Beaty JH. Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics, 13th edition. Philadelphia; Elsevier Mosby. 2017.p 2842.
17. Liu Y, Tao R, Liu F, Wang Y, Zhou Z, Cao Y, et al. Mid-term outcomes after intramedullary fixation of peritrochanteric femoral fractures using the new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). Injury. 2010 Aug;41(8):810-7.
18. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J bone Joint Surg Am. 1969 Jun;51(4):737-55.
19. Konde SS, Borkar SS, Shinde R, Marathe A, Kamath P. Dynamic Hip Screw and Proximal Femoral Nail as a Mode of Surgical Treatment in Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur in Elderly Patients. Journal of Contemporary Medical Research. 2018;5(4):D4-D7.
20. Liu P, Wu X, Shi H, Liu R, Shu H, Gong J, et al. Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation in the management of subtrochanteric femur fractures: a meta-analysis. Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Apr;10:803
21. Kristek D, Lovri? I, Kristek J, Biljan M, Kristek G, Šaki? K. The proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures. Coll Antropol. 2010 Sep;34(3):937-40.
22. Trikha V, Rastogi S. Epidemiology and rehabilitation of hip fractures in the geriatric population. IJPMR. 2005;16(1):16-9.
23. Filipov O. Epidemiology and social burden of the femoral neck fractures. J of IMAB. 2014 Jul-Sep;20(4):516-8.
24. Chincholi S. Occurrence of fracture neck femur in the elderly Indian population. International Journal of Orthopaedics. 2017;3(2):706-9.

Downloads

Published

2018-08-15

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Functional and Radiological Outcome of Fracture Subtrochanteric Femur Treated by Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA). (2018). Journal of Pakistan Orthopaedic Association, 30(02), 82-87. http://jpoa.org.pk/index.php/upload/article/view/211

Similar Articles

1-10 of 188

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.