Outcome of Reamed Intramedullary Interlocking Nail in Tibial Diaphyseal Fractures in Terms of Frequency of Union and Wound Infection

Authors

  • Muhammad Khuram Habib Department of Orthopaedics, DHQ Hospital, Faisalabad
  • Zeeshan Abbas Department of Orthopaedics, DHQ Hospital, Faisalabad

Keywords:

Tibial diaphyseal fracture, intramedullary nail, Reamed nailing

Abstract

Introduction: Open Fracture shaft of tibia is a common orthopaedic problem due to subcutaneous nature of bone, usually managed operatively. The usual operative modalities used for fixation of open fractures are the cast and braces, dynamic compression plate (DCP), external fixator and intramedullary nail (IMN). Postoperative complications reported after intramedullary nailing is infection 12.09%. Union after intramedullary nailing is 85.48%. Intramedullary nailing is the more common surgical treatment option for open tibial diaphyseal fractures (type I and II). Objectives:- To determine outcome of reamed intramedullary interlocking nail in tibial diaphyseal fractures in terms of frequency of union and wound infection. Material & Methods Study Design: - Quasi Experimental Study Setting: The study was conducted in Orthopedic Department of Allied and DHQ Hospital Faisalabad. Duration of Study: - Eight months after the approval of synopsis. From 10-12-2012 to 10-08-2013 Results: 120 patients were included in study, 90 were males and 34 females. Patients were followed for wound infection at 12th postoperative day and union at 24 weeks.109 (87.90%) patients had no infection and 15(12.09%) patients developed infection. 106(85.48%) fractures healed in 24 weeks and 18(14.52%) either went into delayed union or non union. Conclusion: It is concluded that reamed intramedullary interlocking nailing is a good mode of internal fixation in type I and II open fractures of tibia as it allows early weight bearing, minimizes the chances of infection and delayed union and has led to union in maximum cases. 

References

1. Whittle AP. Fractures of the lower extremity. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH, editors Campbell’s operative orthopaedics 11th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2008:3085-3216. 2. Inam M, Arif M, Shabir M. Treatment of close tibial diaphyseal fracture by closed interlocking nail. J Postgrad Med inst. 2008, 22: 47-51. 3. Park HJ, Uchino M, Nakamura K, Ueno M, Kojima Y, Itoman M et, al. Immediate interlocking nailing versus external fixation followed by delayed interlocking nailing for Gustillo type IIIB Open tibial fractures. J Orthop Surg, 2007;15:131-6. 4. Atiquz Zaman,Khan AH,Aziz A.Clinical outcome of close intramedullary interlocking nail in fractured tibia.J Pak Orthop Assoc 2008;20:26-37. 5. Gupta R, Motten T, Kalsotra N,Singh M, Mahajan N & Kiran U.A clinical study for evaluation of results of closed interlocking nailing of fractures of the shaft of the tibia. The Internet J of Orthop Surg, 2010 6. EL Ibrahimi A, Shimi M; Daoudi A; Loudyi D; Elmrini A; Boutayeb, F. Intramedullary nailing in the management of distal tibial fractures Curr Orthop Pract.2009: 20: 300–3 7. Kakar S; Tornetta P 3rd. Open fractures of the tibia treated by immediate intramedullary tibial nail insertion without reaming: a prospective study. J Orthop Trauma. 2007: 21: 153-7. 8. Singh R, Motten T, Kalsotra N, Gupta R, Gupta V. Unreamed solid locked nailing in the treatment of compound diaphyseal fractures of tibia.2010: 17:2. 9. Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J. The epidemiology of tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 1995; 77B: 417“421.

Downloads

Published

2015-03-30

How to Cite

Outcome of Reamed Intramedullary Interlocking Nail in Tibial Diaphyseal Fractures in Terms of Frequency of Union and Wound Infection. (2015). Journal of Pakistan Orthopaedic Association, 27(1), 01-04. http://jpoa.org.pk/index.php/upload/article/view/227

Similar Articles

1-10 of 168

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.