Does Nailing Distal Tibia Metaphyseal Fracture with Modified Interlocking Nail Produce Acceptable Outcome?

Authors

  • Syed Danish Ali Assistant Professor Orthopedics, Fazaia Ruth PFAU Medical College PAF Base Faisal, Karachi
  • Akram Aliuddin Assistant Professor Orthopedics, Fazaia Ruth PFAU Medical College PAF Base Faisal, Karachi
  • Ahmed Ali Associate Professor Orthopedics. Baqai Medical University, Karachi
  • Syed Zohaib Gulzar Naqvi Assistant Professor Orthopedics, Baqai Medical University, Karachi
  • Imran Javed Associate Professor Orthopedics, Fazaia Ruth PFAU Medical College PAF Base Faisal, Karachi
  • Kamran Qureshi Medical Student, Baqai Medical University, Karachi
  • Aslam Siddiqui Professor and Head of Orthopaedic Department Baqai Medical University, Karachi

Abstract

Objective: To determine the functional results of distal tibia metaphyseal fractures treated with modified (shortened) interlocking nail and K wire fixation of the fibula.

Methods: This descriptive study was conducted in Trimax Hospital Karachi from 20th June 2017 to 20th June 2020. All adults patients with distal tibia (5cm) and fibula (?10cm) meeting the inclusion criteria were operated with modified (distal one centimeter of the standard nail was cut) interlocking nail in the tibia and K wire in the fibula. Functional results were assessed at 6th month with the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) questionnaire score and graded as excellent, good, fair and poor. Comparison of AOFAS scores in both gender, sides and fracture types was done and P value was calculated for statistical significance. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The total number of patients in our study were 60. The mean age of our patients was 33±11.5 years. Male patients were 51(85%) and female 9(15%).Right tibia fibula was fractured in 49(81.6%) and left in 11(18.3%). The average union time was 15±4 weeks (range 13 to 18 weeks) As per AOFAS questionnaire score 36(60%) patients had excellent outcome,13 (21.6%)  good and 11(18.3%) had fair outcome. No significant difference was found in AOFAS scores with regard to gender, sides and type of fractures (P>0.05).

Conclusion: Majority of the patients treated with modified (shortened) interlocking nail tibia and K wire fixation fibula achieved excellent and good functional outcome. We therefore recommend this treatment protocol for all patients with distal tibia and fibula fractures.

References

Michael Sirkin, Roy Sanders. The treatment of pilon fractures, Clinic Orthop 2001;32(1):91-102

Prasad SV, Nemade A, Anjum R, Joshi N. Extra-articular distal tibial fractures, is interlocking nailing an option?A prospective study of 147 cases. Chin J Traumatol 2019; 22:103-107.

Xue XH, Yan SG, Cai XZ, Shi MM, Lin T. Intramedullary nailing versus plating for extra-articular distal tibial metaphyseal fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury, Int. J. Care Injured 2014; 45:667–676.

Faraj AA, Johnson VG. Penetration injury of the hindfoot following intramedullary nail fixation of a tibial fracture. Acta Orthop Belg 2002;68:178-81

Mohammed A, Saravanan R, Zammit J, King R. Intramedullary tibial nailing in distal third tibial fractures: Distal locking screws and fracture non-union. Int Orthop 2008;32:547-9.

Hiesterman TG, Shafiq BX, Cole PA. Intramedullary nailing of extra-articular proximal tibia fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011;19:690-700.

Pascarella R, Fravisini M, Traina F, Maresca A, Boriani S. Distal diaphyseal fractures of the tibia treated by modified Grosse-Kempf nail. Chir Organi Mov 2004;89:119-23.

John G, James M, Kevin P, David P. Modified Tibial Nails for Treating Distal Tibia Fractures.J Orthop Trauma 2002;16(1):18-22.

Gorczyca JT, McKale J, Pugh K, Pienkowski D.Modified tibial nails for treating distal tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16:18-22.

Dogra AS, Ruiz AL, Thompson NS, Nolan PC. Dia-metaphyseal distal tibial fractures: treatment with a shortened intramedullary nail: a review of 15 cases. Injury 2000;31:799-8.

Martin JS, Marsh JL, Bonar SK, De Coster TA, Found EM. Assessment of the AO/ASIF fracture classification for the distal tibia. J Orthop Trauma 1997; 11:477-483.

Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M.Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 1994: 349-353.

Fan CY, Chiang CC, Chuang TY, Chiu FY, Chen TH. Interlocking nails for displaced metaphyseal fractures of the distal tibia. Injury, Int. J. Care Injured 2005;36:669-674.

Mosheiff R, Safran O, Segal D, Liebergall M. The undreamed tibial nail in the treatment of distal metaphyseal fractures. Injury 1999;30:83-90.

Schmidt AH, Finkemeier CG, Tornetta III P. Treatment of closed tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:352-68.

Megas P, Zouboulis P, Papadopoulos AX, Karageorgos A, Lambiris E. Distal tibial fractures and non-unions treated with shortened intramedullary nail. International Orthopaedics (SICOT)2003;27:348–351.

Naveed M, Khan Z, Karim Z, Ullah I.Outcome of shortened interlocking nail in distal tibial fractures.Pakistan Postgraduate Medical Journal 2013; 24 (4 ):103-105.

Basit MA, Ijaz A, Khan MZ, Hussain R, Shiraz HM, Rehman MK, et al. A comparative study of Locking Plate Versus Shortened Interlocking nail for treating extra-articular distal Tibia fractures. J Pak Ortho Assoc.2019;31(4):157-162.

Yang SW, Tzeng HM, Chou YJ, Teng HP, Liu HH, Wong CY. Treatment of distal tibial metaphyseal fractures:Plating versus shortened intramedullary nailing. Injury, Int. J. Care Injured 2006;37:531-535.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30

How to Cite

Does Nailing Distal Tibia Metaphyseal Fracture with Modified Interlocking Nail Produce Acceptable Outcome?. (2021). Journal of Pakistan Orthopaedic Association, 33(01), 36-40. http://jpoa.org.pk/index.php/upload/article/view/488

Most read articles by the same author(s)