A Comparative Study of McKenzie Back Program and Conventional Physiotherapy in Relieving Backache due to Lumbar Disc Prolapse.

Authors

  • Safdar Hussain Arain Associate Professor Neurosurgery, Head of Department Neurosurgery, Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences Gambat, Khairpur, Sindh, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Kashif Abbasi Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences Gambat, Khairpur, Sindh, Pakistan
  • Sajjad Hussain Bhatti Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences Gambat, Khairpur, Sindh, Pakistan
  • Agha Syed Ali Haider Naqvi Federal Medical and Dental College Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Ahmed Ali Associate Professor, Baqai Medical University, Karachi
  • Imran Samdani Senior Registrar, Orthopaedic Department, Karachi Medical and Dental College and Abbasi Shaheed Hospital, Karachi

Keywords:

Backache, Disc, Lumbar, McKenzie, Prolapse, Oswestry Disability Index, Visual analogue scale.

Abstract

Objective: To compare McKenzie back program and conventional physiotherapy in reducing pain and functional disability in patients with backache due to lumbar disc prolapse.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in Orthopedic Department Pir Abdul Qadir Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences, Gambat Khairpur Sindh. The duration of this study extended from 2nd March 2019 to 2nd February 2021. All patients with backache due to lumbar disc prolapse fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into two equal groups: Group A (McKenzie back program) and group B (Conventional physiotherapy). Pre-intervention pain assessment was done with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), spine mobility with Fingertip-to-Floor distance (FTF) measured in centimeter and disability with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire in both groups and compared with post-intervention values at 4th, 6th and 8th week. P value was calculated with Chi-square test. P value< 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The total number of patients analyzed were 120.Both group A and B had 60 patients each. The mean age of group A patients was 46.4±5.3 years and group B 45.8±6.4 years. Male patients were 36 (60%) and female 24 (40%) in group A. In group B male patients were 33 (55%) and female 27 (45%). Statistically significant improvement was noted in FTF in group A at 2nd and 4th week (P < 0.05) post-intervention. At 8th week post-intervention VAS, FTF and ODI significantly improved in group A (P< 0.05) than in group B.

Conclusion: McKenzie back program is more effective in reducing pain, increasing lumbar spine mobility and decreasing disability than conventional physiotherapy and stretching exercises in patients with backache due to lumbar disc prolapse.

References

Owen PJ, Miller CT, Mundell NL, Verswijveren SJ, Tagliaferri SD, Brisby H, et al. Which specific modes of exercise training are most effective for treating low back pain? Network meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med2020 ;54(21):1279-1287.

Koes BW, Van Tulder M, Lin CWC, Macedo LG,McAuley J, Maher C, An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J 2010 ;19(12):2075-2094.

Hoy D,March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C, et al. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study .Ann Rheum Dis 2014 Jun;73(6):968-974.

Al-Horani, RA, Al-Trad B, Haifawi S. Modulation of cardiac vascular endothelial growth factor and PGC-1? with regular postexercise cold-water immersion of rats. J Appl Physiol 2019 ;126(4):1110-1116.

Balague F, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Cedraschi C. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet 2012 ;379(9814):482-491.

Zheng CJ,Chen J. Disc degeneration implies low back pain. Theor Biol Med Model 2015;12:24-30.

Freburger JK, Holmes GM, Agans RP, Jackman AM, Darter JD, Wallace AS, et al.The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain.:Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(3): 251–258.

Bindra SA, Sinha, AJK, Benjamin AI.Questionnaire for low back pain in the garment industry workers. Indian J Occup Environ Med 2013;17(2):48-57.

Erdogmus CB,Resch KL,Sabitzer R,Muller H,Nuhr M,Schoggl A, et al.Physiotherapy-based rehabilitation following disc herniation operation: results of a randomized clinical trial. Spine.2007;32(19):041-2049.

O'Sullivan PB, Smith AJ, Beales DJ, Straker LM. Association of biopsychosocial factors with degree of slump in sitting posture and self-report of back pain in adolescents: a cross-sectional study. Phys Ther 2011;91(4):470-483.

Brotz D, Burkard S, Weller M.K. A prospective study of mechanical physiotherapy for lumbar disk prolaps: five year follow-up and final report. Neuro Rehabilitation 2010;26(2):155-158.

Lawrence DJ, Meeker W, Branson R, Bronfort G, Cates JR, Hass M, et al. Chiropractic management of low back pain and low back-related leg complaints: a literature synthesis. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2008;31(9):659-674.

Halliday MH, Garcia AN, Amorim AB, Machado GC, Hayden JA, Pappas E.Treatment effect sizes of mechanical diagnosis and therapy for pain and disability in patients with low back pain: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(4):219-229.

Namnaqani FI, Mashabi AS, Yaseen KM, Alshehri MA. The effectiveness of McKenzie method compared to manual therapy for treating chronic low back pain: a systematic review. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2019;19(4):492-499.

McKenzie R, May S. Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy. 2nd ed. Spinal Publications Ltd. Waikanae, New Zealand 2003.

Machado LAC, de Souza MS, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML. The McKenzie Method for Low Back Pain. A Systematic Review of the Literature With a Meta-Analysis Approach.Spine 2006;31(9):254-262.

Kothari PH, Palekar TJ, Shah MR,Mujawar S.Effects of conventional physiotherapy treatment on kinesiophobia,pain and disability with mechanical low back pain.J Dent Res Rev 2019;6:69-71.

Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2940-2952.

Perret C, Poiraudeau S, Fermanian J, Colau MM, Benhamou MA, Revel M. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the fingertip-to-floor test. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001;82(11):1566-70.

Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:c869.doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869.

Hossain MA, Jahid IK, Hossain MF, Uddin Z, Kabir MF, Hossain KA, et al. Effectiveness of McKenzie Manipulative Therapy on Pain, Functional Activity and Disability for Lumbar Disc Herniation. Rehabilit Med Phys Ther 2020 doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.13.20152843.

Clare HA, Adams R, Maher CG. A systematic review of efficacy of McKenzie therapy for spinal pain. Aust J Physiother 2004;50(4):209-16.

Lam OT, Strenger DM, Chan-Fee M, Pham PT, Preuss RA, Robbins SM. Effectiveness of the McKenzie Method of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy for Treating Low Back Pain: Literature Review With Meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018 Jun;48(6):476-490.

Busanich BM, Verscheure SD. Does McKenzie therapy improve outcomes for back pain?. J Athl Train. 2006;41(1):117-119.

Petersen T, Larsen K, Nordsteen J, Olsen S, Fournier G, Jacobsen S. The McKenzie Method Compared With Manipulation When Used Adjunctive to Information and Advice in Low Back Pain Patients Presenting With Centralization or Peripheralization. Spine2011;36: 1999-2010

Karlsson, M, Bergenheim A, Larsson MEH, Lena Nordeman L, van Tulder M, Bernhardsson S. Effects of exercise therapy in patients with acute low back pain: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2020; 9:182-195.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-12

How to Cite

A Comparative Study of McKenzie Back Program and Conventional Physiotherapy in Relieving Backache due to Lumbar Disc Prolapse. (2021). Journal of Pakistan Orthopaedic Association, 33(02), 76-80. http://jpoa.org.pk/index.php/upload/article/view/538

Similar Articles

1-10 of 92

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)