The Long Term Outcomes of Spinal Fusion in Adult Isthmic Spondylolisthesis

Authors

  • Wajid Akhtar Khyber Teaching Hospital (MTI-KTH) Peshawar
  • Dr. Asif Nawaz
  • Dr. Muhammad Ayaz Khan Professor of Orthopedic & Spine Surgery Khyber Teaching Hospital Peshawar
  • Dr. Muhammad Imran Khan Dept. Of Orthopaedic & Spine Khyber Teaching Hospital Peshawar
  • Dr. Qaisar Khan Experiential Registrar Orthopaedic Department Khyber Teaching Hospital Peshawar
  • Dr. Syed Bakht Sardar Dept. Of Orthopaedic & Spine Khyber Teaching Hospital Peshawar

Keywords:

Lumbar, Patients, Spondylolisthesis, Fusion, Functional, Posterior.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of spinal fusion surgery for different spinal disorders, such as isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Methods: The 67 patients, ages 18 to 55, who had adult lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis and had experienced significant back pain for at least a year, either without or with sciatica. A one-year exercise regimen, posterolateral fusion having instrumentation or having no pedicle screw instrumentation were allotted to the patients at random. The 91 percent of patients had long-term follow-up.

Results: Longitudinal analysis: In both surgery groups, pain and functional impairment were considerably reduced at long-term follow-up compared to before treatment. In every analysed variable, there were no discernible differences between patients who had instruments and those who did not. Although the functional impairment was not improved at all in the exercise group, the discomfort did. Long-term functional impairment in the surgery group was significantly higher than it had been at the 2-year follow-up, as determined by DRI but not ODI. Between long-term and 2-year follow-up, no notable changes were seen in the exercise group. Analysis: In the follow-up of long-term there is no significant differences in between surgical and conservative groups which were seen in any outcome measurement, with the exception of the global assessment and they are significantly better for the patients of surgery. Compared to 50% of the patients receiving conservative care, 76% of patients of surgery rated all the outcomes as better or much better (p = 0.015). In all eight of the analysed areas, and found no differences in the long-term the life-quality measured by SF-36, but it was still much worse than for the general population.

Conclusions: When lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis affects adults, posterior fusion yields a marginally better outcomes of long-term than exercise of a year. Patients having fusion still rate the overall outcomes as superior clearly to patients who received conservative treatment, despite the outcomes indicating that few of previously documented short-term gain are lost with time. Furthermore, one might draw the conclusion that not at all appreciable impulsive enhancement should be anticipated with time in the adult patients having the isthmic spondylolisthesis due to the long-term outcomes of patients who received conservative treatment most likely mirror the normal course. For the majority of patients, significant functional incapacity, pain, and lowered quality of the life are likely to persist for many years.

References

Gibson JA, Waddell G. Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;2005(4). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001352.PUB3

Karcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O, Dikme O. A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to use? Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(4):707-714. doi:10.1016/J.AJEM.2018.01.008

Wang YXJ, Káplár Z, Deng M, Leung JCS. Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis epidemiology: A systematic review with a focus on gender-specific and age-specific prevalence. J Orthop Translat. 2017;11:39. doi:10.1016/J.JOT.2016.11.001

Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A. Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(11):1131-1141. doi:10.1097/00007632-200206010-00002

Campbell P, Foster NE, Thomas E, Dunn KM. Prognostic Indicators of Low Back Pain in Primary Care: Five-Year Prospective Study. J Pain. 2013;14(8):873. doi:10.1016/J.JPAIN.2013.03.013

Wu A, March L, Zheng X, et al. Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(6):299-299. doi:10.21037/ATM.2020.02.175

Pannucci CJ, Wilkins EG. Identifying and Avoiding Bias in Research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(2):619. doi:10.1097/PRS.0B013E3181DE24BC

Design, applications, strengths and weaknesses of cross-sectional, analytical studies (including cohort, case-control and nested case-control studies), and intervention studies (including randomised controlled trials) | Health Knowledge. Accessed July 28, 2023. https://www.healthknowledge.org.uk/public-health-textbook/research-methods/1a-epidemiology/cs-as-is

Mann CJ. Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2003;20(1):54-60. doi:10.1136/EMJ.20.1.54

Zhang H, Wang F, Ding L, et al. A Meta Analysis of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery Using Bone Morphogenetic Proteins and Autologous Iliac Crest Bone Graft. PLoS One. 2014;9(6). doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0097049

Instrumented and noninstrumented posterolateral fusion in adult spondylolisthesis — A prospective randomized study: Part 2 | Request PDF. Accessed July 28, 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12448994_Instrumented_and_noninstrumented_posterolateral_fusion_in_adult_spondylolisthesis_-_A_prospective_randomized_study_Part_2

Ibrahim T, Tleyjeh IM, Gabbar O. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Int Orthop. 2008;32(1):107. doi:10.1007/S00264-006-0269-6

Grogan K, Stearns J, Hogue CW. Brain Protection in Cardiac Surgery. Anesthesiol Clin. 2008;26(3):521. doi:10.1016/J.ANCLIN.2008.03.003

Lee JC, Choi SW. Adjacent Segment Pathology after Lumbar Spinal Fusion. Asian Spine J. 2015;9(5):807. doi:10.4184/ASJ.2015.9.5.807

Wang T, Ding W. Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar fusion surgery in treatment for degenerative lumbar disorders: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1). doi:10.1186/S13018-020-02032-7

Radcliff KE, Kepler CK, Jakoi A, et al. Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventions. The Spine Journal. 2013;13(10):1339-1349. doi:10.1016/J.SPINEE.2013.03.020

Moreau PE, Ferrero E, Riouallon G, Lenoir T, Guigui P. Radiologic adjacent segment degeneration 2 years after lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2016;102(6):759-763. doi:10.1016/J.OTSR.2016.03.012

Fathy M, Fahmy M, Fakhri M, Aref K, Abdin K, Zidan I. Outcome of instrumented lumbar fusion for low grade spondylolisthesis; Evaluation of interbody fusion with & without cages. Asian J Neurosurg. 2010;5(1):41. Accessed July 28, 2023. /pmc/articles/PMC3198657/

Lee YC, Zotti MGT, Osti OL. Operative Management of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease. Asian Spine J. 2016;10(4):801. doi:10.4184/ASJ.2016.10.4.801

Ekman P, Möller H, Shalabi A, Yu YX, Hedlund R. A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration. European Spine Journal. 2009;18(8):1175. doi:10.1007/S00586-009-0947-3

Parai C, Hägg O, Lind B, Brisby H. Follow-up of degenerative lumbar spine surgery-PROMs stabilize after 1 year: an equivalence study based on Swespine data. Eur Spine J. 2019;28(9):2187-2197. doi:10.1007/S00586-019-05989-0

Hammer L, Ingebrigtsen T, Gulati S, et al. Prospects of returning to work after lumbar spine surgery for patients considering disability pension: a nationwide study based on data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. Occup Environ Med. 2023;0:1-8. doi:10.1136/oemed-2023-108864

Chung KJ, Suh SW, Swapnil K, Yang JH, Song HR. Facet joint violation during pedicle screw insertion: a cadaveric study of the adult lumbosacral spine comparing the two pedicle screw insertion techniques. Int Orthop. 2007;31(5):653. doi:10.1007/S00264-006-0249-X

Chung KJ, Suh SW, Swapnil K, Yang JH, Song HR. Facet joint violation during pedicle screw insertion: a cadaveric study of the adult lumbosacral spine comparing the two pedicle screw insertion techniques. Int Orthop. 2007;31(5):653. doi:10.1007/S00264-006-0249-X

Bai DY, Liang L, Zhang BB, et al. Total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine. 2019;98(29). doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000016460.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

The Long Term Outcomes of Spinal Fusion in Adult Isthmic Spondylolisthesis. (2023). Journal of Pakistan Orthopaedic Association, 35(04), 212-220. http://jpoa.org.pk/index.php/upload/article/view/786

Similar Articles

1-10 of 347

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.