Integrated Modular System of Teaching: Evaluation by Student’s at an Undergradute Medical College.

Authors

  • Syed Amir Jalil Head of Department, Department of Orthopaedics, Abbasi Shaheed Hospital Karachi
  • Ambreen Usmani Head of Department, Department of Anatomy, Bahria University Medical and Dental College Karachi

Abstract

Objective: To assess the integrated modular system of teaching of Karachi Medical and Dental College.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was y conducted in Karachi Medical and Dental College from 1st May 2021 to 31st May 2021.Data was collected from first year and second year MBBS students of Karachi Medical and Dental college through a self-administered questionnaire which contained variable regarding participant’s demographics, their views regarding various modes of teaching and different aspects of integrated system of teaching by using a 5 point Likert scale. The questionnaire was validated through a pilot study.

Results: The questionnaires were filled by 215 students. Some students (48.4%, n=104) found lectures a little useful. Majority(58.6%,n=126) students were of the opinion that tutorials were not useful. About 99(46.0%) students agreed that the curriculum taught was at the level of their understanding. A large number 104(48.4%) of students agreed that it helped them understanding topics. Most(51.6%,n=111) were not satisfied with the time allocation for module completion.

Conclusion: Majority of the students were satisfied with the curriculum but were not satisfied with the time allocation for each module. Modular system of teaching also helped students in better learning of pathologies.

References

Kayani ZA, Gilani I. Perceptions of medical teachers about integrated curriculum. Adv Health Prof Educ. 2016;2(1):30-37.

Khan SA, Asadullah M, Naz S. Trends in medical education from traditional to integrated system: Valued by first year MBBS students at a private medical college of Peshawar. J Med Stud.2015; 1(1):12-20.

Rahim A, Iqbal K. Parameters as¬sessed for quality and management of modular system by the students of first and second year MBBS. Khyber Med Univ J 2013; 5(2): 86-90.

Ghayur S, Rafi S, Khan AH, Ahmed RN, Iqbal M. Delivering endocrinology and reproduction in an integrated modular curriculum. J Pak Med Assoc. 2015 Sep;62(9):937-941.

Iqbal T. Integrated medical curriculum: A review of university of health sciences curriculum. Pak J Physiol.2018;14(3):1-2.

Rehman R, Iqbal A, Syed S, Kamran A. Evaluation of integrated learning program of undergraduate medical students. Pak J Physiol. 2011;7(2):37-41.

Basu M, Das P, Chowdhury G. Introducing integrated teaching and comparison with traditional teaching in undergraduate medical curriculum: A pilot study. Med J DY Patil Univ 2015; 8(4):431-438.

Rafique N. Designing and implementation of vertically and horizontally integrated endocrinology and reproductive module. Pak J Physiol 2014; 10(3-4):19-23.

Shaikh AR, Sultana A, Aziz MY. Student’s preferences for modes of teaching in basic medical sciences. J Rawal Med Coll 2015 Mar; 19(1):93-95.

Anwar MS, Zafar H. Incorporation of PBL as a learning strategy in an integrated undergraduate medical curriculum. Isra Med J. 2013 Dec;5(4):246-248.

Raosoft Sample Size Calculator. Available online: http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html (accessed on 22 October 2016).

Qurban S, Saleem S, Muntaha T. Attitude of students towards introduction of integrated module system in undergraduate’s medical curriculum. J Rawal Med Uni 2017;21(S-1):45-48.

Karthikeyan K, Kumar A, A B, D R. Integrated modular teaching in undergraduate medicine. Natl Med J India. 2014 ;27(2):90-94.

Uneeb SN, Zainab S, Khoso A, Basit A. Knowledge scores in annual and modular curriculum among medical students from Karachi, Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 ;71(2(B)):681-685.

Mamoon A, Kamil A.I, Muneeb R, Ahmed H. M. effectiveness of case based learning compared to lectures and tutorial session in medical education: Gender and clinical base perspective. Pak J physiol 2016; 12(1): 42-46.

Rana IN, Aijaz A, Hayat A, Rana MN. Evaluation of undergraduate teaching methodologies. J Rawalpindi Med Coll 2012;16(2):177–179.

Atta IS, El-Hag MA, Ihab Shafek S, Al-Ghamdi HS, Al-Ghamdi TH. Drawbacks in the implementation of an integrated medical curriculum at medical schools and their potential solutions. Education in Medicine Journal. 2020;12(1): 29–42.

Sadiq N, Aurangzeb W, Farooq A, Rauf S, Salman S. A call for mentoring of medical students in the backdrop of integrated curriculum. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2013; 25:74-77.

Anwar MI, Kiani JA, Nadeem N. Integrated Medical Curriculum: Design, Delivery and Assessment during first two years of medical education. PJMHS.2018; 12(4): 1591-1595.

Wilkerson L, Wimmers P, Doyle LH, Uijtdehaage S. Two perspectives on the effects of a curriculum change: student experience and the United States medical licensing examination, step 1. Acad Med. 2007;82(10 Suppl):S117–120.

Shankar PR, Balasubramanium R, Dwivedi NR, Nuguri V. Student feedback about the integrated curriculum in a Caribbean medical school. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2014;11:23.

Thompson AR, Braun MW, O’Loughlin VD. A comparison of student performance on discipline-specific versus integrated exams in a medical school course. Adv Physiol Educ. 2013;37:370–6.

Quintero GA, Vergel J, Arredondo M, Ariza MC, Gómez P, Pinzon-Barrios AM. Integrated medical curriculum: advantages and disadvantages. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2016;3:133–137.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-16

How to Cite

Syed Amir Jalil, & Ambreen Usmani. (2022). Integrated Modular System of Teaching: Evaluation by Student’s at an Undergradute Medical College. Journal of Pakistan Orthopaedic Association, 34(04), 141–144. Retrieved from https://jpoa.org.pk/index.php/upload/article/view/691