Comparison of 1% Silver Sulphadiazine and Chlorhexidine Dressing Combined Versus 5% Chlorhexidine Dressing Alone in Preventing Pin Tract Infection in External Fixators
Keywords:
Chlorhexidine, External Fixator, Pin tract Infection, Silver Sulphadiazine vascularized bone grafts.Abstract
ABSTRACT
Objective: To determine the efficacy of 1% Silver Sulphadiazine and Chlorhexidine dressing combined versus 5% Chlorhexidine dressing alone in preventing pin tract infection in external fixators.
Methods: This was a comparative study done in the Orthopedic Department Hayatabad Medical Complex(HMC) from March 2015 to March 2018 on 198 patients with external fixator in tibia. This study compares the frequency of pin tract infection(PTI) in patients treated with 1 % Silver Sulphadiazine and 5% Chlorhexidine combine (group A) and 5% Chlorhexidine alone(group B).Patients were labelled to have pin tract infection if signs of infection(redness, tenderness, discharge) were noted at pin sites.
Result: The total number of patients in our study were 198 and equally divided into group A and group B. Treatment in group A was effective in 90 (90.9%) patients while group B was effective in 71(71.7%). The difference was statistically significant (p value 0.001).
Conclusion: Combined 1% Silver Sulphadiazine and 5% Chlorhexidine was effective in preventing pin tract infection in majority of patients with external fixators than 5% Chlorhexidine dressing alone.
References
2. Campbell F, Watt E. An exploration of nursing practices related to care of orthopaedic external fixators (pin/wire sites) in the Australian context. Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2019;45-50.
3. Yuenyongviwat V, Tangtrakulwanich B. Prevalence of pin-site infection: the comparison between silver sulfadiazine and dry dressing among open tibialfracture patients. J Med Assoc Thai 2011;94(5):566-9.
4. Ogbemudia AO, Bafor A, Edomwonyi E, Enemudo R. Prevalence of pin tract infection: The role of combined silver sulphadiazine and chlorhexidine dressing. Niger J Clin Pract 2010 ;13(3):268-71.
5. Guerado E, Cano JR, Fernandez-Sanchez F. Pin tract infection prophylaxis and treatment. Injury 2019 :S45-S49.
6. Subramanyam KN, Mundargi AV, Potarlanka R, Khanchandani P. No role for antiseptics in routine pin site care in Ilizarov fixators: A randomised prospective single blinded control study. Injury 2019;50(3):770-776.
7. Ktistakis I, Guerado E, Giannoudis PV. Pin-site care: can we reduce the incidence of infections? Injury 2015;46(3):S35-9.
8. Aboelnaga A, Elmasry M, Adly OA, Elbadawy MA, Abbas AH, Abdelrahman I et al Microbial cellulose dressing compared with silver sulphadiazine for the treatment of partial thickness burns: A prospective, randomised, clinical trial. Burns 2018 ;44(8):1982-1988.
9. Cooke CL, Greene RS, van Eck CF, Uquilas C, Limpisvasti O. Bioelectric Silver-Zinc Dressing Equally Effective to Chlorhexidine in Reducing Skin Bacterial Load in Healthy Volunteers. Arthroscopy 2018 ;34(10):2886-2891.
10. Walker JA, Scammell BE, Bayston R. A web-based survey to identify current practice in skeletal pin site management. Int Wound J 2018;15(2):250-257.
11. Fragomen AT, Miller AO, Brause BD, Goldman V, Rozbruch SR. Prophylactic Postoperative Antibiotics May Not Reduce Pin Site Infections After External Fixation. HSS J 2017 ;13(2):165-170.
12. Lin Y-C, Li Y-J, Rui Y-F, Guang-Chun Dai, Liu Shi, Hong-Liang Xu, et al. The effects of high glucose on tendon-derived stem cells: Implications of the pathogenesis of diabetic tendon disorders. Oncotarget 2017;8(11):17518.
13. Zhao L, Li Y, Chen A, Zhang Z, Xi J and Yang D. Treatment of type C pilon fractures by external fixator combined with limited open reduction and absorbable internal fixation. Foot and Ankle International 2013;34(4):534-542.
14. Ristiniemi J, Luukinen P and Ohtonen P. Surgical treatment of extra-articular or simple intra-articular distal tibial fractures: external fixation versus intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 2011;25(2):101-105.
15. Parameswaran AD, Roberts CS, Seligson D, Voor M. Pin tract infection with contemporary external fixation: how much of a problem? J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17(7):503-507.
16. Kazmers NH, Fragomen AT and Rozbruch SR. Prevention of pin site infection in external fixation: a review of the literature. Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction 2016;11(2):75-85.
17. Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E, Kummer FJ and Koval KJ. Biomechanics of locked plates and screws. J Orthop Trauma 2004;18(8):488-493.23
18. van der Woude JA, Wiegant K, van Heerwaarden RJ, Spruijt S, Emans PJ, Mastbergen SC et al. Knee joint distraction compared with total knee arthroplasty: A. randomised controlled trial. J bone J Surg Br 2017;99(1):51-58
19. Patterson MM. Multicenter pin care study. Orthopaedic Nursing 2005;24(5):349-360.
20. Lethaby A, Temple J, Santy?Tomlinson J. Pin site care for preventing infections associated with external bone fixators and pins. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2013;3;(12):CD004551. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004551.pub3.
21. Toksvig-Larsen S and Lindstrand A. No difference between daily and weekly pin site care A randomized study of 50 patients with external fixation. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 2003;74(6):704-708.
















