.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.jpg)
Satisfaction of Scoliosis patients Using SRS -22 Questionaire Our Experience in Gourki Trust Teaching Hospitals Lahore.
Keywords:
Scoliosis, SRS-22 questionnaire, segmental spine instrumentation, health-related quality of life, clinical outcomesAbstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of scoliosis patients using the SRS-22 questionnaire in a cohort treated with segmental spine instrumentation.
Methodology: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Gourki Trust Teaching Hospitals in Lahore, Pakistan. Medical records of scoliotic patients who underwent segmental spine instrumentation were reviewed, and SRS-22 questionnaires were administered. Preoperative and postoperative data were collected, including Cobb's angles and SRS-22 scores. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 23.9.
Results: Forty-one patients were included in the study, predominantly females (68.3%) with idiopathic scoliosis (78%). Significant reductions in Cobb's angles were observed postoperatively (p < .001). SRS-22 scores indicated high satisfaction levels across various domains, with moderate to high overall satisfaction in HRQoL aspects.
Conclusion: Segmental spine instrumentation demonstrated positive outcomes and significantly improved HRQoL in scoliosis patients. The Urdu-translated SRS-22 questionnaire proved to be a reliable tool for assessing outcomes.
References
Danielsson A, Wiklund I, Pehrsson K, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. Eur Spine J. 2001;10:278–288. doi: 10.1007/s005860100309.
Djurasovic M, Glassman SD, Sucato DJ, Lenke LG, Crawford CH III, Carreon LY: Improvement in Scoliosis Research Society-22R pain scores after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2018;43:127-32. 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001978
Burton MS: Diagnosis and treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Pediatr Ann. 2013;42:224-8. 10.3928/00904481-20131022-09
Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. Scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine. 2003;28:70–73. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00016.
Lonstein JE. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet. 1994 Nov 19;344(8934):1407-12. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90572-x. PMID: 7968079.
Gorman KF, Julien C, Moreau A. The genetic epidemiology of idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(10):1905–19.
Weiss HR, Goodall D. The treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) according to present evidence. A systematic review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008;44(2):177–93.
Trobisch P, Suess O, Schwab F. Idiopathic scoliosis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107(49):875–84.
El-Hawary R, Chukwunyerenwa C. Update on Evaluation and Treatment of Scoliosis. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2014;61(6):1223–41.
Misterska E, Glowacki M, Harasymczuk J. Personality characteristics of females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after brace or surgical treatment compared to healthy controls. Med Sci Monit. 2010;16(12):CR606–15.
Lee JS, Lee DH, Suh KT, Kim JI, Lim JM, Goh TS. Validation of the Korean version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(10):1751–6.
Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, Homel P, Merola AA, Grogan DP, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine. 1999;24(14):1435–40.
Asher MA, Min Lai S, Burton DC. Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument. Spine. 2000;25(18):2381–6.
Scoliosis Research Society. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis March 31. 2009. Available at: http://www.srs.org/professionals/education/adolescent/idiopathic. Accessed June 15 2011.
Carriço G, Meves R, Avanzi O. Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of an adapted Brazilian Portuguese version of Scoliosis Research Society-30 questionnaire. Spine. 2012;37(1):E60–3.
Alzakri A, AlMuhid F, Almousa N, et al. Saudi patients outcomes after surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18:450. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03925-z
Rodrigues LMR, Gotfryd AO, Machado AN, Defino M, Asano LYJ. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: surgical treatment and quality of life. Acta Ortopedica Brasileira. 2017;25(3):85–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220172503157788.
Pellegrino LN, Avanzi O. Prospective evaluation of quality of life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis before and after surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014;27(8):409–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182797a5e.
Carreon LY, Sanders JO, Diab M, Sturm PF, Sucato DJ. Patient satisfaction after surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2011; 36(12):965–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e92b1d.
Linda PD, Randal RB, Lawrence GL, et al. Do radiographic parameters correlate with clinical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine. 2000;25(14):1795–802. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200007150-00010.
Wilson PL, Newton PO, Wenger DR, Haher T, Merola A, Lenke L, Lowe T, Clements D, Betz R. A Multicenter study analyzing the relationship of a standardized radiographic scoring system of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and the scoliosis research society outcomes instrument. Spine. 2002;27(18):2036–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200209150-00013.
Abdelaziz MA, Ali SH, AlQazaz MY, Elshatoury HA, Abou-Madawi A. Evaluation of quality of life (QoL) of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) after surgical correction. Egypt Spine J. 2020;33(1):2–13.
