Early Functional Outcome: Comparison Between Bipolar and Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty

Authors

  • Syed Amir Jalil Department of Orthopaedics, Abbasi Shaheed Hospital, Karachi
  • Muhammad Naseem Department of Orthopaedics, Abbasi Shaheed Hospital, Karachi
  • Rahat Moton Department of Orthopaedic, Abbasi Shaheed Hospital, Karachi
  • Muhammad Imran Javed Department of orthopedic Hamdard College of Medicine and Dentistry Taj medical complex Karachi
  • Rajab Ali Mughal Department of Orthopaedic, Abbasi Shaheed Hospital, Karachi
  • Zeeshan Idrees Department of Orthopaedic, Abbasi Shaheed Hospital, Karachi

Keywords:

Austin Moor, bipolar hemiarthoplasty, neck of femur fractures.

Abstract

Objective: To compare Bipolar and unipolar hemiarthoplasty (HA) treatment for neck of femur fracture in elderly population.

Methods: This is a descriptive randomized study, conducted from January 2014 to May 2015. All the patients were sixty years and above with Garden type III and IV Neck of femur fracture. The patients were randomly placed in two groups. Group A were treated with bipolar and B with unipolar Austin Moor (AM) hemiarthoplasty (HA). Non-weight bearing mobilization on 1st postoperative day. Weight bearing with crutches on 3-5th postoperative day. Early outcome was assessed at 3 months follow-up, using Harris hip score.

Results: Thirty patients were divided into two groups, i.e., 15 in each. Patients in group A have returned to daily living activities earlier then patients in group B. Group A has 87% (n=13) excellent, 13% good with no fair and poor results while group B has 53% excellent, 33% good and 13% fair results.

Conclusion: Bipolar hemiarthoplasty is an effective treatment for neck of femur fractures in elderly population.

Author Biography

  • Muhammad Imran Javed, Department of orthopedic Hamdard College of Medicine and Dentistry Taj medical complex Karachi

    Associate Professor,

References

1. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetablular fractures; treatment by mold arthroplasty; an enBMJd result study using a new method of result evaluation. JBJS (Am) 1969 jun;51-A: 737-55.
2. Frihagen F, Nordsletten L, Madsen JE (2007). Hemiarthoplasty or internal fixation for intracapsular displaced femoral neck fractures: randomized controlled trial. BMJ 2007 Dec;335(7632); 1251-1254.
3. Bhandari M, Bevereaux PJ, Tometta P, Swiontkowski MF, Berrry DJ, Haidukewych G et al (2005). Operative management of displaced femoral neck in elderly patients. An international survey. JBJS (Am) 2005 Sep;87(9):2122-2130.
4. Inngul C, Hedbeck CJ, Blomfeldt R, Lapidus G, Ponzer S, Enocson A. Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versu bipolar hemiarthroplsty in patients with diplaced femoral neck fracutres. A four year followup of a randomized controlled trial. Int Orthop. 2013 Dec; 37(12):2457-64.
5. Macaulay W, Pagnotto MR, Iorio R, Mont MA, Saleh KJ. Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 May; 14(5): 287-93.
6. Garden RS. Low-angle fixation in fractures of the femoral neck. JBJS [Br] 1961;43:647-663.
7. Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach to the hip. JBJS [Br] 1982;64-B:17-27.
8. Hinchey JJ, Day PL. Primary prosthetic replacement in fresh femoral neck fractures: a review of 294 consecutive cases. JBJS [Am] 1964; 46-A: 223-40.
9. Phillips TW. The Bateman bipolar femoral head replacement: a fluoroscopic study of movement over a four-year period. JBJS [Br] 1987;69-B:761-4.
10. Suman RK. Prosthetic replacement of the femoral head for fractures of the neck of the femur: a comparative study. Injury 1979; 11: 309-16.
11. Hedbeck CJ, Blomfeldt R, Lapidus G. TOrnkvist H, Ponzer S, Tidermark J. Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in the most elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomized, controlled trial. Int Orthop 2011 Nov;35(11): 1703 – 1711.
12. Parker MJ, Gurusamy KS, Azegami S. Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Databse Sys Rev. 2010 Jul;(6) CD001706.
13. Kofoed H, kofod J: Moore Prosthesis in the treatment of fresh femoral neck fractures: A critical review with special attention to secondary acetabular degeneration. Injury 1983 May;14:531-540.
14. Malhotra R, Arya R, Bhan S. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1995;114:79-82.
15. Raia FJ, Chapman CB, Herreta M, Schweppe MW, Michelsen CB, Rosen wasser MP: Unipolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003 Sep;414:259-265.
16. Grosso MG, Danoff JR, Padgett DE, Iorio R, Macaulay WB. The Cemented Unipolar Prosthesis for the Management of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in the Dependent Osteopenic Elderly. J Arthroplasty. 2016 May; 31(5):1040-6.

Downloads

Published

2019-01-02

How to Cite

Early Functional Outcome: Comparison Between Bipolar and Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty. (2019). Journal of Pakistan Orthopaedic Association, 30(03), 98-101. http://jpoa.org.pk/index.php/upload/article/view/214

Similar Articles

1-10 of 162

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)